There are allegations against chairman of the FCC, Ajit Pai that he "has taken actions to improperly benefit Sinclair broadcast group" a large media group with interest in television and Internet. The actions that Chairman Pai has taken would change Net Neutrality rules to benefit large media companies allowing them to redirect internet resources to favored clients.
Under current regulations the FCC prohibits media companies from monitoring or redirecting Internet resources to favor any one client.
Congressman Elijah Cummings and ranking member Frank Pallone have asked the Federal Communications Commission Inspector General to investigate Chairman Pai to determine the legality of his authority to change regulations affecting net neutrality.
Apparently the leadership of the Sinclair Broadcast Group, one of the largest broadcast television stations in the United States, influenced the chairman to take actions that would relax broadcast ownership rules providing special benefit to media companies.
In the event, that the net neutrality regulations are rewritten to benefit media companies, the middle class will suffer from higher costs that can be imposed by their media resource companies.
I support an effort to block this kind of re-regulation by asking United States Senators to intervene on behalf of the constituents in their communities. This can best be done by calling your senator's office and asking that s/he contact the FCC on behalf of his constituents to let them know that he supports Title 2.
Rabbi and Community
Wednesday, November 22, 2017
Friday, December 23, 2016
Merry Christmas, Happy Channukah, Healthy New Year...
Introduction:
In
the Sherman Park neighborhood, were Barbie and I live, the community
enjoys a blog called "NextdoorAuerHouse" a play on a Street
name here in Sherman Park, 'Auer Street'. One of our neighbors wanted
to recognize Hannuka and reprinted an article that speaks of the
common themes of Hannukah and Christmas. Specifically Jean want to
wish the Jewish Community a very Happy Chanukah. Her greetings
included the prayer that the Jewish Community take pride in the hero
of the day "Judas Maccabee"
An Open Letter to Jean:
Dear
Jean,
Thank
you for sharing the article identifying the common themes found in
Chanukah and Christmas. There are truths in the article you shared
and I don't want to belittle the core message intended by the
original author. I cannot comments on the historical or biblical
thoughts Christian sections. Nonetheless, the observance of
Hanukkah is well within my wheelhouse and it is there that I wish to
make some observations.
Was it Judas Maccabee or Judah Maccabee? H-U-G-E difference!
It
was 'Judah' Maccabees, not "Judas" Maccabee; Judah
Maccabees was a namesake of Jacob's son Judah, as found in the book
of Exodus; chapter one verse two.
Judas has no relationship to Judaism:
Judas
had no relationship to Judaism and if my memory serves me correctly,
he was a disciple of Jesus and Christians believe that he betrayed
his relationship with Jesus. The storyline for Judas as depicted in
the New Testament is very different from the life of Judah Maccabee,
a hero and role model, for Jewish children and adults throughout the
ages. Judah was the son of Jacob and has a life message and is a role
model for the children of Israel for millennia.
Judas had no relationship to Judaism and if my memory serves me correctly, he was a disciple of Jesus and Christians believe that he betrayed his relationship with Jesus. The storyline for Judas as depicted in the New Testament is very different from the life of Judah Maccabee, a hero and role model, for Jewish children and adults throughout the ages. Judah was the son of Jacob and has a life message and is a role model for the children of Israel for millennia.
Judah the Hero!!!
Judah Maccabees is a hero for the children of Israel and Judah the son of Jacob is also a hero having saved his youngest brother Benjamin from imprisonment in pharaohs dungeons.
Judah a Light for the Children of Israel....
Second,
the light that emanates from the Menorah, for eight days, is about a
miraculous story found in the Talmud (Oral Law) of Sanhedrin which
speaks of a small vial of oil found soon after the liberation of Holy
Temple. That vile allowed the Kohanim (Priests) to illuminate the
Menorah but the vile contained a small amount of oil; enough oil for
one day.
After
the menorah was lit it illuminated the Menorah and Holy Temple for
eight consecutive days. The miracle of the oil allowed
the Priests sufficient time to make fresh oil to keep the
Menorah lit day in and day out for eight days. However, the light of
the Menorah represents a much greater miraculous event; a small army
with limited resources, led by Judah Maccabees, a captain who had
little military training, was able to overcome the professional Roman
legions with their military might and tools of war. The
City of Jerusalem and the Holy Temple was liberated by a small a rag
tag Militia when “a great miracle happened there” (words
associated with the Draidel a toy Jewish children play with on
Hannukah). Jerusalem was rebuilt and the Temple restored is that
is the real miracle. Jerusalem's restoration speaks to the power of
faith and the resources that faith provides against much
greater odds.
Chanukah not biblically ordained!
Hanukkah
is not a Biblical ordained holiday. In the article that you shared
with the community the author writes; "Hanukkah was not a Torah
festival" and the correction that I want to make is about the
sanctity of the days. The Holy Days found in the Torah are ordained
by the word of God as Holy Days and thus have sanctity because of
God's command. Hanukkah is a minor festival in that it is ordained as
a Holy Day by the rabbis of the Sanhedrin and thus lack the sanctity
of God's spoken word and therefore are considered minor holidays.
Minor corrections but unimportant to the greater message...
There
are many others small and an unimportant corrections that could
be made to the article. For example, what exactly they did when they
entered the Holy Temple for the first time is really unknown
other than the removal of those things that defiled the Holy Temple
and the lighting of the Menorah. They restored the daily functions of
the Priestly responsibilities. The Star of David that today is
an important symbol of the Jewish people, may or may not have
not been returned to the Holy Temple. The repairs took years and what
happened immediately were the basics that allowed the
Kohanim to work in their capacity as Priests.
A Light to Our Nation........
Judah
Maccabees and his brothers and father were a light to our nation. All
people have the capacity to enlighten the world as teachers and role
models.
Obviously,
Christianity and the other great religions of the world have teachers
and role models that enlighten the world we live in. That these two
holidays coincide in the middle of the winter and have light
associated with the observance is strictly coincidental. The message
is far more important. I cannot speak to the Christmas holidays since
I know little about the in depth of the observances.
The
Christmas season has a powerful impact on the way people interact
with one another. Unfortunately, the goodness that we experience
because of Christmas for the month around the holiday quickly
disappears. By the middle of January, it's hard to remember the
vacation we enjoyed as the Christmas holidays neared. It is indeed
like a vacation from Thanksgiving to Christmas and when the vacation
is over, it's hard to remember the respite.
Perhaps we need to find ways to extend the kindness of the December experience into January and February and on.
When
I would speak to Christian audiences about the observance of Hanukkah
and its relationship to Christmas, I would often times tell them that
the only relationship that exists is the one that Hallmark
introduced. I know this sounds very cynical but there is nothing
cynical about sharing a time of the year when all of us seek to bring
peace and charity into the world. In fact, the spirit of
Passover and Easter have a greater commonness about them then
Hanukkah and Christmas.
The
light that is brought to the world in the darkest months of the year
is not the light of the candles of the Christmas ornaments but rather
the light of the spirit that we offered to one another during this
time of year.
A Blessing to all of my neighbors, Good Health, Happiness and Joy..
To
all of you who are observing holidays other than Hannukah. May
you have a very happy and healthy holiday season. Together let’s
try to extend the good will toward mankind threw the month of
January.
Tuesday, November 15, 2016
Trump, Bannon, Should Jews Stay or Leave?
The article below is reprinted from the online magazine Tablet@Table.com which appears in my "inbox" regularly. It's moving and the author is moving. I've been reading his articles for a while. Please see his short bio below. This is his response to the election President Elect Trump.
Liel Leibovitz is an Israeli-American journalist, author, media critic and video game scholar. Leibovitz was born in Tel Aviv, immigrated to the United States in 1999, and earned a Ph.D. from Columbia University in 2007.
by Liel Leibovitz
My grandfather Siegfried was not a sophisticated man. When he bought a car—always the same car, a blue Peugeot 305, replaced every few years with a newer model of the same exact make—he kept the seats covered in plastic to keep them eternally clean. When you asked him for an apple, he’d hold the fruit in his hand and rotate it like a tiny globe, peeling it with his pocketknife and making sure to remove only the skin and none of the flesh. When I ran away, as a child of 6 or 7, to explore a park nearby, he dashed out the door, wearing nothing but his underwear, and ran until he found me and hugged me tight. He didn’t even hear the passersby who pointed and laughed. Nothing mattered to him but his family.
He died when I was very young, so I know his life’s story only as a broad outline: Educated in a conservatory in Vienna, he was a promising young violinist and composer when he was spooked by the goosesteps of Hitler’s goons. He convinced two of his sisters to trade in a continental future for one less tender on the shores of Palestine. Some of his friends, maybe even members of his family, pointed and laughed then, too, telling him he was hysterical, that he was getting it all wrong, that it couldn’t possibly be that bad. But grandpa Siegfried wouldn’t listen: His simple heart advised him to take the thugs at their word and leave. At least that’s how I imagine it—he never spoke of those early days, and his family and friends were all soon seized, deported, and murdered.
I’m not sharing this particular story at this particular point in time to make some kind of historical analogy. Those are rarely useful even under the best of circumstances, and to compare Donald Trump to the Fuhrer or his ascent to the rise of the Third Reich is an absurd and reprehensible proposition. But I’ve been thinking a lot about my grandfather’s story this past week, and in it I find three simple commandments I can’t bring myself to dismiss.
The first, and most obvious, is this: Treat every poisoned word as a promise. When a bigoted blusterer tells you he intends to force members of a religious minority to register with the authorities—much like those friends and family of Siegfried’s who stayed behind were forced to do before their horizon grew darker—believe him. Don’t try to be clever. Don’t lean on political intricacies or legislative minutia or historical precedents for comfort. Don’t write it off as propaganda, or explain it away as just an empty proclamation meant simply to pave the path to power. Take the haters at their word, and assume the worst is imminent.
Do that, and a second principle follows closely: You should treat people like adults, which means respecting them enough to demand that they understand the consequences of their actions. Explaining away or excusing the actions of others isn’t your job. Vienna in the first decades of the 20th century was a city inflamed with a desire to better understand the motives, hidden or otherwise, that move people to action. Freud and Kafka, Elias Canetti and Karl Kraus, Stefan Zweig and Franz Werfel—these were the eminences who crowded the same cafés Siegfried and his musician friends most likely frequented. But while these beautiful minds struggled to understand the world around them, the world around them was consumed by simpler and more vicious appetites. Don’t waste any time, then, trying to understand: Then as now, many were amused by the demagogue and moved by his vile vision. Some have perfectly reasonable explanations for their decisions, while others have little to go on but incoherent rage. It doesn’t matter. Voters are all adults, and all have made their choices, and it is now you who must brace for impact. Whether you choose to forgive those, friends and strangers alike, who cast their votes so deplorably is a matter of personal choice, and none but the most imperious among us would advocate a categorical rejection of millions based on their electoral actions, no matter how irresponsible and dim. So while you make these personal calculations, remember that what matters now isn’t analysis: It’s survival.
Which leads me to the third principle, the one hardest to grasp: Refuse to accept what’s going on as the new normal. Not now, not ever. In the months and years to come, decisions will be made that may strike you as perfectly sound, appointments announced that are inspired, and policies enacted you may even like. Friends and pundits will reach out to you and, invoking nuance, urge you to admit that there’s really nothing to fear, that things are more complex, that nothing is ever black or white. It’s a perfectly sound argument, of course, but it’s also dead wrong: This isn’t about policy or appointments or even about outcomes. This isn’t a political contest—it’s a moral crisis. When an inexperienced, thin-skinned demagogue rides into office by explaining away immensely complex problems while arguing that our national glory demands we strip millions of their dignity or their rights, our only duty is to resist by whatever means permitted us by law. The demagogue may boost the economy, sign beneficial treaties, and mend our ailing institutions, but his success can never be ours. Our greatness, to use a tired but true phrase, depends on our goodness, and to succeed, we must demand that our commander in chief come as close as is possible to reflecting the light of that goodness. There’s no point indulging in the kind of needlessly complex thinking that so often plagues the intelligent and the well-informed. There’s no room for reading tea leaves, for calculations or projections or clever takes. The only thing that matters now is the simple moral truth: This isn’t right. As long as we never forget that, we can never lose: As grandpa Siegfried knew all too well, those who refuse to gradually put up with the darkness are making a very safe bet; if you’re wrong, there’s no harm, but if you’re right, you win more or less everything.
So forgive me if these next four years I’m not inclined to be smart. When it comes to the task ahead, I’ve no interest in deep dives or shades of grey or mea culpas. Like my grandfather, I’m a simple Jew, and like him, I take danger at face value. When the levers of power are seized by the small hands of hateful men, you work hard, you stand with those who are most vulnerable, and you don’t give up until it’s morning again. The rest is commentary.
Liel Leibovitz is an Israeli-American journalist, author, media critic and video game scholar. Leibovitz was born in Tel Aviv, immigrated to the United States in 1999, and earned a Ph.D. from Columbia University in 2007.
by Liel Leibovitz
My grandfather Siegfried was not a sophisticated man. When he bought a car—always the same car, a blue Peugeot 305, replaced every few years with a newer model of the same exact make—he kept the seats covered in plastic to keep them eternally clean. When you asked him for an apple, he’d hold the fruit in his hand and rotate it like a tiny globe, peeling it with his pocketknife and making sure to remove only the skin and none of the flesh. When I ran away, as a child of 6 or 7, to explore a park nearby, he dashed out the door, wearing nothing but his underwear, and ran until he found me and hugged me tight. He didn’t even hear the passersby who pointed and laughed. Nothing mattered to him but his family.
He died when I was very young, so I know his life’s story only as a broad outline: Educated in a conservatory in Vienna, he was a promising young violinist and composer when he was spooked by the goosesteps of Hitler’s goons. He convinced two of his sisters to trade in a continental future for one less tender on the shores of Palestine. Some of his friends, maybe even members of his family, pointed and laughed then, too, telling him he was hysterical, that he was getting it all wrong, that it couldn’t possibly be that bad. But grandpa Siegfried wouldn’t listen: His simple heart advised him to take the thugs at their word and leave. At least that’s how I imagine it—he never spoke of those early days, and his family and friends were all soon seized, deported, and murdered.
I’m not sharing this particular story at this particular point in time to make some kind of historical analogy. Those are rarely useful even under the best of circumstances, and to compare Donald Trump to the Fuhrer or his ascent to the rise of the Third Reich is an absurd and reprehensible proposition. But I’ve been thinking a lot about my grandfather’s story this past week, and in it I find three simple commandments I can’t bring myself to dismiss.
The first, and most obvious, is this: Treat every poisoned word as a promise. When a bigoted blusterer tells you he intends to force members of a religious minority to register with the authorities—much like those friends and family of Siegfried’s who stayed behind were forced to do before their horizon grew darker—believe him. Don’t try to be clever. Don’t lean on political intricacies or legislative minutia or historical precedents for comfort. Don’t write it off as propaganda, or explain it away as just an empty proclamation meant simply to pave the path to power. Take the haters at their word, and assume the worst is imminent.
Do that, and a second principle follows closely: You should treat people like adults, which means respecting them enough to demand that they understand the consequences of their actions. Explaining away or excusing the actions of others isn’t your job. Vienna in the first decades of the 20th century was a city inflamed with a desire to better understand the motives, hidden or otherwise, that move people to action. Freud and Kafka, Elias Canetti and Karl Kraus, Stefan Zweig and Franz Werfel—these were the eminences who crowded the same cafés Siegfried and his musician friends most likely frequented. But while these beautiful minds struggled to understand the world around them, the world around them was consumed by simpler and more vicious appetites. Don’t waste any time, then, trying to understand: Then as now, many were amused by the demagogue and moved by his vile vision. Some have perfectly reasonable explanations for their decisions, while others have little to go on but incoherent rage. It doesn’t matter. Voters are all adults, and all have made their choices, and it is now you who must brace for impact. Whether you choose to forgive those, friends and strangers alike, who cast their votes so deplorably is a matter of personal choice, and none but the most imperious among us would advocate a categorical rejection of millions based on their electoral actions, no matter how irresponsible and dim. So while you make these personal calculations, remember that what matters now isn’t analysis: It’s survival.
Which leads me to the third principle, the one hardest to grasp: Refuse to accept what’s going on as the new normal. Not now, not ever. In the months and years to come, decisions will be made that may strike you as perfectly sound, appointments announced that are inspired, and policies enacted you may even like. Friends and pundits will reach out to you and, invoking nuance, urge you to admit that there’s really nothing to fear, that things are more complex, that nothing is ever black or white. It’s a perfectly sound argument, of course, but it’s also dead wrong: This isn’t about policy or appointments or even about outcomes. This isn’t a political contest—it’s a moral crisis. When an inexperienced, thin-skinned demagogue rides into office by explaining away immensely complex problems while arguing that our national glory demands we strip millions of their dignity or their rights, our only duty is to resist by whatever means permitted us by law. The demagogue may boost the economy, sign beneficial treaties, and mend our ailing institutions, but his success can never be ours. Our greatness, to use a tired but true phrase, depends on our goodness, and to succeed, we must demand that our commander in chief come as close as is possible to reflecting the light of that goodness. There’s no point indulging in the kind of needlessly complex thinking that so often plagues the intelligent and the well-informed. There’s no room for reading tea leaves, for calculations or projections or clever takes. The only thing that matters now is the simple moral truth: This isn’t right. As long as we never forget that, we can never lose: As grandpa Siegfried knew all too well, those who refuse to gradually put up with the darkness are making a very safe bet; if you’re wrong, there’s no harm, but if you’re right, you win more or less everything.
So forgive me if these next four years I’m not inclined to be smart. When it comes to the task ahead, I’ve no interest in deep dives or shades of grey or mea culpas. Like my grandfather, I’m a simple Jew, and like him, I take danger at face value. When the levers of power are seized by the small hands of hateful men, you work hard, you stand with those who are most vulnerable, and you don’t give up until it’s morning again. The rest is commentary.
Monday, August 29, 2016
Something Sacred
My
Mother, was born in Brooklyn, New York in 1916. That in and of
itself, is nothing special, however, what is special is that my
mother’s, Mother and Father, were born in New York prior to the
turn of the century and that is special. What is really special, is
that my m\Mother’s grandmother and grandfather were born in the
United States in the middle of the 19th century and that
is almost unheard for Jews. You’ve got it right, I am a fifth
generation American born Jew.
My
Mother with little or no knowledge of what it meant to be Jewish,
married a first generation American Jew and the son of Hassidick
Malamud (teacher). My Father’s parents spoke Yiddish in their home
and little or no English. My Mother’s parents spoke German and
Hungary, although born in the United States.
Before
the turn of the 20th Century there were about 500,000 Jews
in the US and most of them were German and Hungarian born. Between
1880 and 1920 two million Jews immigrated to the US from eastern
Europe. Jews were looking to escape the pogroms of Shtetel life that
would force young Jewish men to serve in the Military, often, never
to be seen again. Jewish families also sought freedom from the
indignity of discrimination imposed by police, military and civilian
mobs.
My
Zayde and Bubbe came here from Austria-Poland in 1905. First my Zayde
came and then he brought my Bubbe and their two oldest children. My
father and his younger brother were born here in the US.
My
Zayde was a Sadia Ger Chassid and a Malamud (teacher) and my Bubbe
ran a Kosher Dairy restaurant on the lower east side. When my father
married my mother, his parents wanted proof of her Jewish lineage.
My
Mother had little or no Jewish identity. Her parents lived completely
secular lives. Esther, my mother, had a Jewish name and new she was
Jewish but that was the depth of her Jewish identity. Esther was
orphaned by the time she 17 years old and only she and her younger
brother were left. My mother was forced to care for her younger
brother with a little help from cousins.
Esther
dropped out of High School to work at S. Klein’s a large home-goods
store. Her meager wages provided for herself and her brother George.
My mother had no recollection of Sabbath or Kashrut or anything
Jewish in her parents’ home. Passover had a place in her memory
because they would join one of their cousin’s for a Seder at The
Pride of Judea Home, orphanage, in New York. My Mother’s cousin
were benefactors to the home.
When
my Father married my Mother it was as if he had married someone from
a foreign land who didn’t know the customs or the language.
My
Mother did not keep kosher, make Sabbath meals, or light Sabbath
Candles. The Yartshites of her parents were not observed. My Mother
didn’t attend Synagogue, not even on Yom Kippur. Then something
completely unimaginable happened. Something unexpected and
unpredictable. Something that would change her life forever.
One
day, after returning from religious school, I announced that I wasn’t
going to eat from my mother’s kitchen anymore. My Mother didn’t
have a clue as to why, so she asked; don’t you like the way I cook?
I thought to myself; Why would she think that I didn’t like her
cooking. “Of course I like the way you cook.” It was clear that
my Mother didn’t have a clue, and then she asked; “Why won’t
you eat from my kitchen?” “We don’t keep kosher and God wants
Jewish people to eat kosher”. “How do you know that?”, she
asked. Rabbi Lieberman said; “God commanded us to only eat kosher;”
I went on to explain that we needed to kosher our kitchen. I was only
eight years old at the time and my mother didn’t have a clue what
it meant to keep kosher but she was supportive and so she took my
feelings seriously.
My
Mother was a practical soul and she was also the Mother of six sons.
Every day, at least one of her sons wanted something. Today, Peter,
wanted a kosher kitchen and she took my request in stride. Esther
assumed that this was a fad and I would get over it. My mother
didn’t make Chazer (pork) and she used kosher meat, for my Father’s
sake, so she assumed that keeping kosher wasn’t a huge stretch. Mom
promised me that she would Kosher the kitchen on Passover if it was
still important. We had just started the school year so waiting for
Passover would allow her six months time to observe my interest in
Judaism.
Passover
came and Rabbi Lieberman came to the house to help my Mother kosher
the kitchen. For the first Passover we used the most minimal dishes
and stove-ware to take care of the holiday. The Sunday after Passover
we drove from our suburban home, to the Lower East-side, were
Fortunoff’s, a large Jewishly owned housewares store was
headquartered. My Mother and Father purchase all new dishes fleshig
(Meat) milchig (Dairy) and pots and pans to go along. We Toiveled the
dishes in a local Mikvah (a tradition of dipping the dishes in rain
water) and low and behold we had a kosher kitchen. Did my interest
last, you may ask, by the time I turned ten, I was traveling 45
minutes by train, in each direction to attend Yeshiva six days a
week.
Kashruth,
Sabbath, Tallit, Teffilin, Shabbat Candles are ways we hold on to our
heritage. It’s also a way we transfer our faith to future
generations. I can remember as if it were yesterday, my Mother
standing before the Shabbath candles and saying the blessing in
English; “who commanded us to light the Shabbath Candles.”
Observance provides a personal connection with tradition and God
Almighty.
What
makes my Mother’s story amazing is that without the slightest
connection to Judaism, she remained Jewish. However, in my mother’s
days, Jews were not really welcome outside the Jewish community.
Cultural diversity and tolerance were yet to be learned and some
would say, still to be learned. Nevertheless, I believe if my Mother
grew up in my generation, the outcome would have been very different.
If Esther had lived today, in all likelihood, she would not have
survived as a Jewish woman to raise a Jewish family.
The
Pew Research Center in 2013 spoke of a changing horizon for American
Jewry. The
Pew survey described an energetic Jewish community and reported “that
Jewish identity is changing in America, where one-in-five Jews (22%)
now describe themselves as having no religion”.
Conservative
Judaism once was the description of the majority of Jews, now only
18% of Jews identify as Conservative having changed places with
Reform Judaism representing 35% of Jewish households. For sure the
moderate branches of Judaism are shrinking and the more traditional
branches are growing. The moderate branches of Orthodoxy are growing
but not nearly as fast as the Hassidim are growing.
Why
is this happening? There is not one simple answer but part of the
answer has something to do with spiritual satisfaction. Satisfaction
is not easily achieved in general. Ask a musician if they are
satisfied with their skills or an artist are they are satisfied with
their skills. Few people are satisfied and success often depends on
us seeking greater ability. Spirituality is the same. Religious
people are always seeking to improve their relationship with God.
“Healthy
start” is a good recommendation for all things. Children should
have a healthy start in their day, meaning a decent meal. A “healthy
start” in their education and a “healthy start” in their
spiritual identity. We can begin by regularly providing our families
with something sacred to cling to while we express the sense of
sacredness we experience. In this equation there must be truth and
integrity. I recommend that everyone choose a comfortable path and
make sure your family has and maintains a healthy start.
Wednesday, August 24, 2016
What makes Traditional Judaism different From All Other Branches of Judaism
A young colleague of mine was asked to define the difference between Orthodox, Traditional Judaism and Conservative Judaism and he wrote the following article. Noah Gradofsky is a lawyer, has chosen to practice the rabbinate after graduating from the Union for Traditional Judaism (UTJ) rabbinical school, the Institute for Traditional Judaism (ITJ). His sentiment is exactly why I believed in Traditional Judaism and he said it, better than I ever could. Enjoy!
by Rabbi Noah Gradofsky
by Rabbi Noah Gradofsky
Let
me state from the outset that I am not empowered to speak for the
UTJ,
though I am one of the musmakhim (ordainees) of the Institute for
Traditional Judaism (ITJ) and have served on the UTJ board for many years.
The UTJ has a diverse membership, and I dare say that many of the rabbis
who participate in the UTJ have very different perspectives on many of the
important questions about Judaism. Hopefully our diversity and our respect
for those different perspectives is part of our definition. But then
again, I guess there have to be some boundaries that make us who we are.
Given all this, much of what I say will be as much about me as about the
UTJ, but I will try to keep things as basic as possible to hopefully
provide a perspective that is shared by most of the members of UTJ. I’d
like to focus on how UTJ’s approach to Torah and halakha might compare and
contrast with the Conservative and Orthodox movements.
On study of Torah, I think UTJ represents a more spiritual version of the
mixture of academic and classic study of Torah that you might find in the
Conservative movement. I say this recognizing that this is probably mostly
based on my (our?) sense of what spirituality is. I attended JTS (the
Conservative movement flagship institution) for my undergraduate education
and learned a great deal. However, I often found the learning to be
antiseptically academic, to lack a sense of religious meaning, and to
relish tearing down religious beliefs (admittedly, this was my own sense,
and I imagine others feel differently). My studies and interactions at UTJ
have always affirmed and built up faith and treated all forms of learning
as a deeply religious act.
At the other end of the spectrum, Orthodoxy often imposes a very strict
dogmatic structure on the understanding of Torah. For instance, to me, the
introduction to the ArtScroll Chumash basically says that studying Torah
without holding a very narrow interpretation of Torah MiSinai is worthless,
and in the “*Torah u-Madda Journal” *(Volume 3) Rabbi Parnes declared that
Orthodox freedom of inquiry must be limited if such inquiry might undermine
Rambam’s faith dogmas. But if faith dogmas prevent us from considering
what may be the reality of God’s world and our record of God’s revelation,
then those dogmas really don’t speak of faith in God, but of faith in our
human constructs. In fact, to the contrary, the result is to impose our
own wishes on God and Torah. I imagine that many UTJ members take a more
narrow view of the necessary dogmas of Jewish faith. As Professor Marc
Shapiro (for clarity, Professor Shapiro is not a UTJ member) demonstrates
in “*The Limits of Orthodox Theology*,” Rambam’s view was anything but
universal. For instance, my teacher (ITJ faculty member) Rabbi Alan Yuter
paraphrases Rabbi Yosef Albo’s dogmas of faith as “God is real, God
commands, God holds accountable.” Based on the above, UTJ embraces academic
learning and all that it has to offer in shedding light on our sacred
texts. We see using every tool at our disposal to illuminate Torah and
help us understand God’s will, not as a threat to our faith, but as a
sacred imperative. At the same time, we reaffirm our faith in God, divine
revelation (Torah min hashamayim), and the authority of Torah and halakhah
as the expression of God’s will for the Jewish people. Our Reish Metivta,
Rabbi Halinvi coined the motto for our school, the ITJ, as “Emunah Tserufah
v’Yosher Da’at” – genuine faith and intellectual honesty – and that, I
think, is the UTJ’s clarion call.
As to halakhah, UTJ adopts a traditional approach to halakhah, one that I
would argue is more traditional than the approach taken by an Orthodox
Judaism moved to a reactionary approach by fear of the risks posed by more
liberal forms of Judaism. I think that by and large we believe the
Conservative movement evolved into a system of halakhah where halakhic
decisions often represent a combination of capitulation to a generally
non-observant lay community and an overemphasis of modern philosophy and
morality in the halakhic system. This is not to say that modern ideas and
ideals do not have a voice in the halakhic system. My teacher (ITJ faculty
member) Hakham Isaac Sassoon, for instance, speaks strongly of the
importance of incorporating values of fairness and human dignity into the
halakhic system. It is unfathomable to believe that a sense of morality
did not figure in the decisions of earlier rabbis, and it is illogical to
imagine that all new thoughts of morality should be isolated from the
halakhic process. However, for the most part we believe that morality
should have a voice and not a veto in the halakhic process and understand
that lending excessive weight to moral speculation can undermine the
halakhic system as a whole.
More generally, I would mention that I think UTJ rabbis are generally more
willing to reconsider common practice in the face of the halakhic textual
evidence. Some of us (myself included, largely learned from Rabbi Yuter)
follow Rambam’s approach, as presented in the introduction to Mishneh
Torah, whereby we look to whatever opinion seems to fit the Talmudic
evidence best. Others of us, for example, my teacher Rabbi Richard Wolpoe
(ITJ faculty member), lend more weight to common practice. In large part
this owes perspective stems from Rabbi Wolpoe seeing halakhah more in the
frame of a common law system, such that the decisions of rabbis over time
can gain a level of halakhic canonicity, whereas Rabbi Yuter sees halakhah
more in the context of a positive law system, where the authority of
post-Talmudic decision making is based solely on the power of the arguments
behind the decision. However, I think we all in some sense are a bit more
willing to consider that common practice in the Orthodox community is not
necessarily the correct halakhah. I also think we are more apt to consider
whether modern situations require us to revisit some prior halakhic
standards (in the same way that Arukh haShulchan OCH 75:8, for instance,
says that the definition of ervah has changed in modern society). Along
the same lines, I think UTJ members are generally opposed to the idea that
anything new must be viewed with suspicion and presumptively be considered
outside halakhic boundaries. Most of us adopt the approach of ChaZa”L in
Mishnah Eduyot 2:2, that the fact that something has not been done in the
past is not proof that it may not be done today.
It is also worth noting that the UTJ has less of a taste for hierarchical
halakha than the Orthodox world does, in that the Orthodox world tends to
lend halakhic weight almost exclusively to its most renowned rabbis. I was
taught by my teachers at the ITJ that I had a responsibility and
prerogative to voice my own opinion, and I know that my teachers would be
universally disappointed in me were I to defer to their opinion where I saw
matters in a different light based on my textual or sociological judgment
(this is not to suggest that I don’t lend importance to the views of my
teachers).
Finally, I think it is significant that, for the most part, UTJ eschews
denominational labels and we believe that these labels obscure as much as
they enlighten. We believe that it is far more important to conform our
actions and beliefs to the will of the Almighty than to the consensus of
any political or sociological identity.
Returning to where I started, this is for the most part my personal
opinion. Painting with very broad strokes, hopefully I have given some
sense of what sets UTJ apart from the Conservative and Orthodox movements.
May we all merit from bringing klal Yisrael closer to God, Torah, and good
deeds.
though I am one of the musmakhim (ordainees) of the Institute for
Traditional Judaism (ITJ) and have served on the UTJ board for many years.
The UTJ has a diverse membership, and I dare say that many of the rabbis
who participate in the UTJ have very different perspectives on many of the
important questions about Judaism. Hopefully our diversity and our respect
for those different perspectives is part of our definition. But then
again, I guess there have to be some boundaries that make us who we are.
Given all this, much of what I say will be as much about me as about the
UTJ, but I will try to keep things as basic as possible to hopefully
provide a perspective that is shared by most of the members of UTJ. I’d
like to focus on how UTJ’s approach to Torah and halakha might compare and
contrast with the Conservative and Orthodox movements.
On study of Torah, I think UTJ represents a more spiritual version of the
mixture of academic and classic study of Torah that you might find in the
Conservative movement. I say this recognizing that this is probably mostly
based on my (our?) sense of what spirituality is. I attended JTS (the
Conservative movement flagship institution) for my undergraduate education
and learned a great deal. However, I often found the learning to be
antiseptically academic, to lack a sense of religious meaning, and to
relish tearing down religious beliefs (admittedly, this was my own sense,
and I imagine others feel differently). My studies and interactions at UTJ
have always affirmed and built up faith and treated all forms of learning
as a deeply religious act.
At the other end of the spectrum, Orthodoxy often imposes a very strict
dogmatic structure on the understanding of Torah. For instance, to me, the
introduction to the ArtScroll Chumash basically says that studying Torah
without holding a very narrow interpretation of Torah MiSinai is worthless,
and in the “*Torah u-Madda Journal” *(Volume 3) Rabbi Parnes declared that
Orthodox freedom of inquiry must be limited if such inquiry might undermine
Rambam’s faith dogmas. But if faith dogmas prevent us from considering
what may be the reality of God’s world and our record of God’s revelation,
then those dogmas really don’t speak of faith in God, but of faith in our
human constructs. In fact, to the contrary, the result is to impose our
own wishes on God and Torah. I imagine that many UTJ members take a more
narrow view of the necessary dogmas of Jewish faith. As Professor Marc
Shapiro (for clarity, Professor Shapiro is not a UTJ member) demonstrates
in “*The Limits of Orthodox Theology*,” Rambam’s view was anything but
universal. For instance, my teacher (ITJ faculty member) Rabbi Alan Yuter
paraphrases Rabbi Yosef Albo’s dogmas of faith as “God is real, God
commands, God holds accountable.” Based on the above, UTJ embraces academic
learning and all that it has to offer in shedding light on our sacred
texts. We see using every tool at our disposal to illuminate Torah and
help us understand God’s will, not as a threat to our faith, but as a
sacred imperative. At the same time, we reaffirm our faith in God, divine
revelation (Torah min hashamayim), and the authority of Torah and halakhah
as the expression of God’s will for the Jewish people. Our Reish Metivta,
Rabbi Halinvi coined the motto for our school, the ITJ, as “Emunah Tserufah
v’Yosher Da’at” – genuine faith and intellectual honesty – and that, I
think, is the UTJ’s clarion call.
As to halakhah, UTJ adopts a traditional approach to halakhah, one that I
would argue is more traditional than the approach taken by an Orthodox
Judaism moved to a reactionary approach by fear of the risks posed by more
liberal forms of Judaism. I think that by and large we believe the
Conservative movement evolved into a system of halakhah where halakhic
decisions often represent a combination of capitulation to a generally
non-observant lay community and an overemphasis of modern philosophy and
morality in the halakhic system. This is not to say that modern ideas and
ideals do not have a voice in the halakhic system. My teacher (ITJ faculty
member) Hakham Isaac Sassoon, for instance, speaks strongly of the
importance of incorporating values of fairness and human dignity into the
halakhic system. It is unfathomable to believe that a sense of morality
did not figure in the decisions of earlier rabbis, and it is illogical to
imagine that all new thoughts of morality should be isolated from the
halakhic process. However, for the most part we believe that morality
should have a voice and not a veto in the halakhic process and understand
that lending excessive weight to moral speculation can undermine the
halakhic system as a whole.
More generally, I would mention that I think UTJ rabbis are generally more
willing to reconsider common practice in the face of the halakhic textual
evidence. Some of us (myself included, largely learned from Rabbi Yuter)
follow Rambam’s approach, as presented in the introduction to Mishneh
Torah, whereby we look to whatever opinion seems to fit the Talmudic
evidence best. Others of us, for example, my teacher Rabbi Richard Wolpoe
(ITJ faculty member), lend more weight to common practice. In large part
this owes perspective stems from Rabbi Wolpoe seeing halakhah more in the
frame of a common law system, such that the decisions of rabbis over time
can gain a level of halakhic canonicity, whereas Rabbi Yuter sees halakhah
more in the context of a positive law system, where the authority of
post-Talmudic decision making is based solely on the power of the arguments
behind the decision. However, I think we all in some sense are a bit more
willing to consider that common practice in the Orthodox community is not
necessarily the correct halakhah. I also think we are more apt to consider
whether modern situations require us to revisit some prior halakhic
standards (in the same way that Arukh haShulchan OCH 75:8, for instance,
says that the definition of ervah has changed in modern society). Along
the same lines, I think UTJ members are generally opposed to the idea that
anything new must be viewed with suspicion and presumptively be considered
outside halakhic boundaries. Most of us adopt the approach of ChaZa”L in
Mishnah Eduyot 2:2, that the fact that something has not been done in the
past is not proof that it may not be done today.
It is also worth noting that the UTJ has less of a taste for hierarchical
halakha than the Orthodox world does, in that the Orthodox world tends to
lend halakhic weight almost exclusively to its most renowned rabbis. I was
taught by my teachers at the ITJ that I had a responsibility and
prerogative to voice my own opinion, and I know that my teachers would be
universally disappointed in me were I to defer to their opinion where I saw
matters in a different light based on my textual or sociological judgment
(this is not to suggest that I don’t lend importance to the views of my
teachers).
Finally, I think it is significant that, for the most part, UTJ eschews
denominational labels and we believe that these labels obscure as much as
they enlighten. We believe that it is far more important to conform our
actions and beliefs to the will of the Almighty than to the consensus of
any political or sociological identity.
Returning to where I started, this is for the most part my personal
opinion. Painting with very broad strokes, hopefully I have given some
sense of what sets UTJ apart from the Conservative and Orthodox movements.
May we all merit from bringing klal Yisrael closer to God, Torah, and good
deeds.
___
You can reach Noah at noah@e-ark.net
You can reach Noah at noah@e-ark.net
Sunday, August 21, 2016
Milwaukee Burned On the 9th of Av a Prophecy or was it Poverty
August
14 was an important day in the Jewish calendar. The Jewish community
commemorated the ninth day of Av one of the most frightening days on
the Jewish Calendar. On that day we commemorated the destruction of
both Holy Temples when Jews of that day watch as both Temples burned
to the ground. A final reminder that Jews would be driven into the
diaspora the psalmist declared “to disperse their offspring among
the nations and scatter them through the lands (JPS
1999)” (Psalms 106:27).
It
seemed ironic that on the 9th of Av the Sherman Park
neighborhood, on Milwaukee's Northside, were many orthodox Jews live,
the City was ablaze the result of riots. Some of the members of the
Jewish Community would be heard to say that it was an omen of things
to come. Others, would blame the fires and rioting on the lack of
mutual respect in this integrated neighborhood. The riots were
instigated when a 23 year old Black man was killed
by a black
Milwaukee
police officer. Two young men ran from police
after a traffic stop. The driver raised a weapon and was
fatally shot after he refused a
police order to
drop the gun.
Justified
or not, the shooting instigated a riots. Police were fired upon by
civilians, people pelted the police with rocks and gun fire could be
heard all around the neighborhood were I live. Chaos prevailed and
police force was brought in to bring the crisis under control. It
took three days to restore quiet and those three days felt like three
months. Barbie and I basically hunkered down and decided to let
things cool before venturing far from home.
On
the afternoon of Tisha B’Av I attended synagogue, to pray with a
minyon (a quorum of men) and when the services were done I sat to
talk with my friend Tuvia. We've been pals for more than 30 years
and we’ve supported each other in times of prosperity and in times
of despair but we have always been at each others side. Soon the
conversation turned to politics. Suddenly, and unexpectedly, I
learned that this dear and sweet friend would vote for Trump if he
were only an American citizen. Thank God he’s not. That being said,
I was still shocked and surprised that Tuvia would advocate and
politic for a man who violates every moral expectation Judaism places
on it adherents. While Trump is not Jewish and therefore not
obligated to these Torah rules, nevertheless, most of these rules are
universally accepted as the moral precepts for all of humanity. Don’t
call people by derogatory names. Don’t lie about the character of
others. Don’t mislead your fellow human. Don’t steal from others
to preserve your own wealth.
Some
people talk about Trump’s statesmanship but the question for me is
the clarity of his moral vision. His mission is self and not
community. He does not sacrifice personal needs for the betterment of
his fellow human being. Trump like Darwin categorizes people into
subgroups from superhuman to subhuman and we cannot deny the
unfortunate application of organic evolution to describe those
considered to subhuman. We have heard and witnessed this regrettable
behavior, when he stands before an audience and demeans a man with a
disability and jests about his tremor and his struggle with speech;
there was nothing funny about his mimicking the reporter’s tremor
and voice, this is not about statesmanship it’s about dignity and
Trump lacks the humility and dignity to be President of the United
States.
People
who care about people don't mock others especially not the disable.
If you plan on voting for Trump ask yourself this;
Do
you want Donald Trump to serve as a role model for children around
the world?
Would
you want your children or grandchildren to see President Donald Trump
taunting the disabled?
Donald
Trump makes disrespectful sexual suggestions about his own daughter;
would you want your teenagers to hear the President make remarks that
are disrespectful to mothers, daughters beloved family members?
The
seriousness of his failure to control his words can best be seen in
an article published by the New York Times. I urge you to read the
following
article.(http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/01/28/upshot/donald-trump-twitter-insults.html?_r=0#rockin-in-the-free-world)
Jewish
law identifies this behavior as Mozei Shem Rah (disparaging
accusations) and declares it spiritually offensive. According to
Judaism 101, “money
lost can be repaid, but the harm done by speech can never be
repaired. For this reason, some sources indicate that there is no
forgiveness for lashon ha-ra (disparaging speech)”.
The
source found in the Torah comes from Leviticus “Do not deal basely
with your countrymen. Do not profit by the blood of your fellow: I am
the L-ord. (Lev.19:16 JPS 1999)”
Trump
is vile in every respect and his values are diametrically opposed to
what Judaism teaches us about building a moral code.
When
my grandparents arrived in New York after months of traveling across
Europe and then across the ocean to a land they only read about in
books. They came to a place were the language was different, the
culture was different, the monetary system was different but they
were willing to pay the price in order that their family might be
free and able to practice their religious beliefs. When they arrived
these are the words etched as the foot of the Statue of Liberty.
“Give
me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me:
I lift my lamp beside the golden door.”
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me:
I lift my lamp beside the golden door.”
These
words were exactly what they wanted to see, an invitation to sit at
the table of democracy and enjoy the illumination of the light of
freedom.
Mr.
Trump thinks that "extreme, extreme, very extreme vetting, is
the answer to the problem of immigration". There was a time when
my ancestors aboard the St. Louis were returned to Nazi Germany to
face certain extermination because the United States engaged in
“extreme vetting”. Nine hundred thirty seven men, women and
children were returned to Germany and refused entrance to Cuba or the
US. The Holocaust Museum in Washington DC reports about the
passengers on the St. Louis the following: “Hostility
toward immigrants fueled both antisemitism and xenophobia. Both
agents of Nazi Germany and indigenous right-wing movements hyped the
immigrant issue in their publications and demonstrations, claiming
that incoming Jews were Communists.” Does this
sound familiar? Has the crowds at the Trump rallies hyped the idea
that immigrants are criminal who steal jobs from American Citizens?
The
idea of turning people away because there might be among them a
terrorists, or they might be criminals, or steal jobs from citizens
is abhorrent and should make us feel ashamed. Trump’s father was an
immigrant but now he wants to exclude his father and anyone like him,
if they were citizens of Syria or a country with a majority of
Muslims, they are to be immediately refused entry.
The
guile of this egotistical maniac violates every Jewish principle the
Torah teaches. When my friend told me that he would support Mr. Trump
if he had the opportunity to vote, I was shocked, appalled, ashamed
and embarrassed and the tone of my voice reflected my feelings. My
friend is a man who likes peace, he rarely argues and usually finds a
way to reach common ground about most matters but not on this matter.
He said to me; " you will have to account for this in the world
to come!" I responded; "I'm prepared to defend my actions.”
Again he pressured me, "Have you asked a great Rabbi?" I
told him; "on matters of spiritual issues I ask great Rabbis but
on political matters, I make decisions based on my personal
knowledge.” Then came the common Israel card, "Israel he said;
what about Israel?" Again I responded; "I'm not voting for
the President of the State of Israel, I'm electing the President of
the United States and I expect that s/he will serve the citizens of
this country to the best of their ability." My friend was
appalled: "You don't take care of your fellow Jews first."
I tried to defuse the conversation since we were not going to find
common ground and I told him that I always try and do what's best for
the Jewish community but not at the expense of 300 million of my
fellow Americans who depend on my vote to live in peace, harmony and
prosperity."
We
walked out of the building wishing each other well but frustrated
that we had seen a side of one another that we did not approve of and
wished that it were different.
Milwaukee
burned on Tisha b'Av and there was some irony in the experience and
an underlying message as well. My friend would say that the spiritual
events of the day meant the Messiah was on his way.
For
me, the message of the day is that it’s time to get our act
together. We can't have 48% of the black community, their young
leadership, between the ages of 15 and 35 serving prison sentences.
The prisons are overcrowded and all we can expect is more abuse of
those rookies who join the prison system.
We
can't continue to ignore the importance of providing reasonable
opportunities for young black men and women to be educated in
suitable educational environments. Including academic and trade
schools that will allow our neighbors to prosper.
In
a country as rich as ours, everyone, has the right to live in
reasonable, safe housing. All people have the right to live in
respectable safe housing. If they quelled the riots in New York by
offering opportunity to the poor we sure should be able to do it in
Milwaukee.
We
cannot continue to take from the very poor and give to the rich. Tax
breaks for multimillionaires and billionaires is absolutely offensive
and we need to really think about our moral mission. When we take 500
million from the University system and allot that same money to build
a basketball stadium for the owners of a basketball team who are
billionaires there is something serious wrong with our adherence to a
universal moral code. The State of Wisconsin under the leadership of
Scott Walker and his cronies has lost its virtuous way and abandoned
the poor and down trodden.
The
Preamble to our constitution declares that “we the people of the
United States, in order to form a more perfect Union, establish
Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense,
promote the general Welfare,” these are bold goals but not only are
they goals; they define the moral vision of the “founders” of
this unique country.
Our
country has also lost the vision of the founders and thus lost it’s
moral way. The day we elected “Tea Party” candidates who
advocated a Christian agenda from their personal perspective, is the
day our Constitution was violated. Abortion is not a high priority
when we have The Bill of Rights which guarantees freedom of religion
for all people be they Jews, Muslims, Christians, Hindus and even
those who practice Wicket. Forty Six million people are in poverty
and 48.1 million peoples in America will suffer “food insecurity”
or a euphemism for Hunger. Shouldn’t we be worrying about the
people who are hungry rather than the unborn. Paul Ryan went home for
his summer vacation without having Congress address the Zika virus
and ensuring funds to protect against the virus. Protection to avoid
the spread of Zika and the birth defects secondary to the virus.
Families are going to abort when they learn the results of the blood
tests that records their infection with Zika and Paul Ryan will be
responsible in part for those abortions.
Time
to put our house in order. Black Lives Matter, Chidrens' Lives
Matter, the Hungry Matter, and until we work on Community needs
rather than tax breaks for billionaires we can expect our city’s to
suffer and efforts to get attention will go eyry.
Our
children will look back on our generation beginning with the boomers
and describe them as be selfish and self centered. Turning this
Country around begins with every citizen.
Sunday, July 24, 2016
My Name is Moshe Duvid...
When
the Jewish community mourns the breach of the walls of the Old
City
of Jerusalem on
the 17th
of Tammuz as Israel’s enemies
ventured to destroy the Holy
Temple; and as we begin counting the three weeks up to Tisha b'Av
which reminds us of the actual destruction
of Solomon’s Great Temple and
our exile from Israel.
My brothers and
I remember our
eldest brother Martin
David.
Marty
as we called him, was a character in
his own right.
He was the
first of six sons born to my mother and father, Harry and Esther.
Marty
provided my parent with a learning
experience
and he was a challenge from day one. He was bright and inquisitive
and gave
my parents a run for their money. The
more they tried to coral his raw energy the more he ran from here to
there and back. In Yiddish they would say; “he had ‘shpilkas’
and he did. In the hopes of disciplining his overwhelming energy, my
father, convinced Marty
to join the Army and learn a trade. When
Marty
was 18 years
old he
enlisted in the Army.
Early on it became evident that if an honorable medical discharge was
not arranged, he would spend his military career in the stockade.
With the assistance of a Congressman the discharge was arranged and
Marty returned home.
Somehow
Marty ended up learning to drive a ‘Big Rig’ and his career as
a trucker was
born. He
loved to drive and
it was a place were he succeeded
until the sleeping and eating on the road got the best of his health.
By the time he was 40 years old, Marty, although six foot tall
was
so obese that he had difficulty moving around and keeping himself
awake behind the wheel. He could no longer sleep the
weight on his chest narrowed his wind pipe he could not breath when
on his back. It
wouldn’t be long before he
fell asleep at the wheel and ran his truck into an abutment.
Marty
lost
his license for the
big
rig and was forced to take up driving a cab. He liked
driving a cab just as much and told
his customers the stories of driving cross country. When the lottery
became legal he would box his cab number in
the lottery tickets in the hopes of winning the big one.
He liked to gamble and he loved the pony’s so
food and gambling became his obsessions.
Marty
drove
all over Long Island and New York. Frequently,
when I would return home from school on an
out
Shabbat from the train to my parents I
would travel by cab.
All
the other drivers knew and liked Marty. He was a conundrum
in his own right.
As
time went by, the wanderer in Marty took
him from city to city visiting his mother and father who
by now retired and were
living
in New Mexico. Followed
by visits
to each of his brothers and his Cousin Robert, all living in
different places. We
never knew when Marty would show up at the door with
his suitcase in hand, needing a bath, clothes that needed washing, a
small and reasonable wish list and sometimes, medical care.
In
my home the wish list had to do with foods he associated with his
childhood, giffilte fish and borscht with sour cream. It
was hard
to watch his deterioration but
easy
to fill his needs. Although, admittedly, I was not as tolerant
with him as Barbie, he
would come and stay for several days then move on to
his next port of call in the storm of life. It took a
few dollars for his pocket, a suitcase with clean clothes
and off he went.
My
mother tells this story about Marty. Esther reported that when Marty
was a little child she went shopping for groceries. His
curiosity got the best of him and
he wandered off. When
my mother realized he was gone she became panicked and began looking
all threw the large store to find him. My
mother
reported that she was absolutely frantic.
Then
without warning,
a policeman approached her and asked; “did
you misplace a little boy”?
“Did
you find him;” she asked. “Yes,
I
think so.”
The
policeman
asked; “blue-eyed, blond
hair?”
“Yes...Yes,
were is he?”
“He
is
upfront at the service counter we’re
holding him there for you”; the
policeman reported. “Are
you Mrs. Duvid?” the policeman asked. My mother was set a
back
by
the question and
didn't know how to respond.
My
mother asked
the policeman to repeat the question. Again
he asked;
“Are you Mrs.Duvid?” Quizzically my mother responded Mrs. Duvid?
He
is Martin and I am Esther Mehler, his mother. Where
did you get the idea that my name is Mrs.Duvid? The policeman said;
“I asked him
his
name and he told me it was “Moshe Duvid”.
My
mother then realized that my brother had given this Irish policeman
his Hebrew name and so the policeman thought his
first name was Moshe and his last name was Duvid.
That
was Marty's life. We
worried toward the end of his life that he would be
found
unconscious
and
no one would know his name. When
he passed
Marty was 540
lbs.
He
was found alive
but near death on
the streets
of
Mesa Arizona and
taken
to a hospital. He
had collapsed from his diabetes and
other medical conditions.
When the nurse called to inform us
of Marty's impending
death, she said my
tour is almost over but I
will stay with him and not leave his
side
until he passes.
As
a young boy a policeman identified Marty and became his guardian and
protective angel and as he was
about
to leave this world a nurse identifies Marty as needing a guardian
angel to help him find his way and she helps escort him through the
transition between this World
and the ‘World to Come’.
There
is much more to tell of Marty’s
story but I will stop here since I
plan to post
every year on his Yartshite a
story about his life.
However,
what resonates
for me in this
story, is my mother’s experience in the grocery would
foretell the
story of my brother
Marty's life. My
mother and
father didn't
know it then but Marty would be a wanderer
and we were
concerned
that when his time came to leave this
world, would those
around him
know his name. The
answer
came when the nurse reported that he carried
my business card in his wallet. That
is the only reason they knew his name and identity.
To
this day, I believe and I advocate, my mother watched over Moshe
Duvid carefully after she lost him in the grocery.
One
of Marty’s
final
requests
was that
he buried next to my mother and in accordance with his wish he lies
near my mother in Sheboygan Wisconsin at the Mehler Family Grave
site.
He
is missed his soul is loved and the stories of his life will be told
for a long time to come.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)